In the best interest of the child
Jun. 3rd, 2012 11:14 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
7rin posting in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
7rin_on_adoptionThe Secret History of Social Service Crimes: Hitler + today's Social Worker "In the best interest of the child" sounds familiar?
by Cess Ssec - 28 Mar 2011
“In the best interest of the child" - Do you know what this means...?
It was an SS Nazi slogan, now used by today's family courts to determine custody:
It is also... the prime directive of all Child Protection Services.
“Justice denied anywhere, diminishes justice everywhere.” Martin Luther King, Jr.
_______________________________________________________
by Nicolas Stathopoulos
[SSEC] Social Service Economic Crimes (research)
Social service crimes research
cess.ssec@gmail.com
SSEC (research) © Copyright 2011
The Lebensborn program was a Nazi organizational project set up by SS leader Heinrich Himmler, which provided, managed and ran orphanages, social service centers and relocation programs for children.
Lebensborn, for all intent and purpose, was designed to become a human breeding program.
"In the best interest of the child, we are breeding superior Aryan children" (SS Nazi chant)
The Lebensborn program, was founded and created on December 12, 1935, to promote the policies of Nazi eugenics among other interests. One, of the objectives was to perpetrate, an illusion of superiority (of the Aryan race) over all other inferior races.
Some of the ideas used to create the Lebensborn program were extensions of similar programs already practiced and in place throughout North America, such as those created by the Alberta Eugenics Board which was set up in 1928 to eliminate the feeble minded individual from existence.
The Lebensborn centers, homes and facilities were also used to house young children between two and six years old kidnapped, to be put through a process of Germanization.
The program promoted the breeding, growth and the indoctrination of superior Aryan populations, by providing incredibly specialized health care programs which, were managed by social engineers, social workers and administered by the best practitioners in the Fatherland.
Additionally, access to special medical programs that applied eugenics and Darwinian principles among other "race" criteria were also implemented.
During the war, Lebensborn also processed the adoptions by German families of children from occupied northern and eastern Europe. (Orphans) A substantial number of children were also taken away from their German parents by a form of social services to be placed in the Lebensborn program for the sake and security of the "fatherland" and "in the best interest of the child"
There is an undeniable correlation between the above-mentioned and today's Child Protection Service system which we have found to have it's origins partly traced back to the Nazi Lebensborn project.
Additionally, SSEC (research) has also discovered that today's social service agencies, throughout North America and the western world, globally and uniformly also conform to policies that are philosophically based on eugenics and thus, originate from only one source.
The Lebensborn project, was created to eventually become the defacto authority over the German family unit.
Consequently, today's social services were created to control population and thus, also become an authority over the family unit.
The older children in the Lebensborn program, were sent to institutions specifically dedicated to the Germanization process.
The younger children would be held back to be observed, studied and cataloged at the homes where they were kept in, before they were adopted.
The slogan “In the best interest of the child" was an SS Nazi undertaking, codenamed “The "Lebensborn Project” it was by all standards a plan to create superior Aryan children for the Germanic Nazi state, based on the theory of eugenics and Darwinism:
“In the best interest of the child” is also a favorite line, perpetually quoted by today's Social Workers, Child Protection Services and Family Court Judges to denote a perceived authority and perceived expertise over the family unit. However, they are only invoking an ambiguous term without any clear definition to obtain a wining condition, under the color of law.
by Cess Ssec - 28 Mar 2011
“In the best interest of the child" - Do you know what this means...?
It was an SS Nazi slogan, now used by today's family courts to determine custody:
It is also... the prime directive of all Child Protection Services.
“Justice denied anywhere, diminishes justice everywhere.” Martin Luther King, Jr.
_______________________________________________________
by Nicolas Stathopoulos
[SSEC] Social Service Economic Crimes (research)
Social service crimes research
cess.ssec@gmail.com
SSEC (research) © Copyright 2011
The Lebensborn program was a Nazi organizational project set up by SS leader Heinrich Himmler, which provided, managed and ran orphanages, social service centers and relocation programs for children.
Lebensborn, for all intent and purpose, was designed to become a human breeding program.
"In the best interest of the child, we are breeding superior Aryan children" (SS Nazi chant)
The Lebensborn program, was founded and created on December 12, 1935, to promote the policies of Nazi eugenics among other interests. One, of the objectives was to perpetrate, an illusion of superiority (of the Aryan race) over all other inferior races.
Some of the ideas used to create the Lebensborn program were extensions of similar programs already practiced and in place throughout North America, such as those created by the Alberta Eugenics Board which was set up in 1928 to eliminate the feeble minded individual from existence.
The Lebensborn centers, homes and facilities were also used to house young children between two and six years old kidnapped, to be put through a process of Germanization.
The program promoted the breeding, growth and the indoctrination of superior Aryan populations, by providing incredibly specialized health care programs which, were managed by social engineers, social workers and administered by the best practitioners in the Fatherland.
Additionally, access to special medical programs that applied eugenics and Darwinian principles among other "race" criteria were also implemented.
During the war, Lebensborn also processed the adoptions by German families of children from occupied northern and eastern Europe. (Orphans) A substantial number of children were also taken away from their German parents by a form of social services to be placed in the Lebensborn program for the sake and security of the "fatherland" and "in the best interest of the child"
There is an undeniable correlation between the above-mentioned and today's Child Protection Service system which we have found to have it's origins partly traced back to the Nazi Lebensborn project.
Additionally, SSEC (research) has also discovered that today's social service agencies, throughout North America and the western world, globally and uniformly also conform to policies that are philosophically based on eugenics and thus, originate from only one source.
The Lebensborn project, was created to eventually become the defacto authority over the German family unit.
Consequently, today's social services were created to control population and thus, also become an authority over the family unit.
The older children in the Lebensborn program, were sent to institutions specifically dedicated to the Germanization process.
The younger children would be held back to be observed, studied and cataloged at the homes where they were kept in, before they were adopted.
The slogan “In the best interest of the child" was an SS Nazi undertaking, codenamed “The "Lebensborn Project” it was by all standards a plan to create superior Aryan children for the Germanic Nazi state, based on the theory of eugenics and Darwinism:
“In the best interest of the child” is also a favorite line, perpetually quoted by today's Social Workers, Child Protection Services and Family Court Judges to denote a perceived authority and perceived expertise over the family unit. However, they are only invoking an ambiguous term without any clear definition to obtain a wining condition, under the color of law.