In the best interest of the child

[7rin]

The Secret History of Social Service Crimes: Hitler + today's Social Worker "In the best interest of the child" sounds familiar?
by Cess Ssec - 28 Mar 2011

“In the best interest of the child" - Do you know what this means...?

It was an SS Nazi slogan, now used by today's family courts to determine custody:

It is also... the prime directive of all Child Protection Services.

“Justice denied anywhere, diminishes justice everywhere.” Martin Luther King, Jr.

_______________________________________________________

by Nicolas Stathopoulos
[SSEC] Social Service Economic Crimes (research)
Social service crimes research
cess.ssec@gmail.com
SSEC (research) © Copyright 2011


The Lebensborn program was a Nazi organizational project set up by SS leader Heinrich Himmler, which provided, managed and ran orphanages, social service centers and relocation programs for children.

Lebensborn, for all intent and purpose, was designed to become a human breeding program.

"In the best interest of the child, we are breeding superior Aryan children" (SS Nazi chant)

The Lebensborn program, was founded and created on December 12, 1935, to promote the policies of Nazi eugenics among other interests. One, of the objectives was to perpetrate, an illusion of superiority (of the Aryan race) over all other inferior races.

( Read more... )

Wenzhou couple fined record amount for having second child

[7rin]

http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?id=20120602000041&cid=1103&MainCatID=11

Wenzhou couple fined record amount for having second child
Staff Reporter 2012-06-02

A couple in China have been fined 1.3 million yuan (US$204,000) for having a second child, setting a record for violating the one-child policy in the city Wenzhou in eastern China's Zhejiang province, reports our Chinese-language sister newspaper Want Daily.

The couple are reportedly wealthy and paid the fine without difficulty. After a businessman in the city was fined 1 million yuan (US$158,000) in 2007, the record for the amount of the fine has reportedly been broken several times. The fairness of the policy has been called into question, with many saying that it is effectively a license for those wealthy enough to afford to pay to have more children.

The amount of the fine for every additional birth is arrived at through doubling to quadrupling the previous year's average disposable income for urban residents or the net income for rural residents, according to the policy. The number of violators in Wenzhou accounts for half the population of the city, and those who paid more than 1 million yuan were employers.

---

"So if it costs up to $200,000 to keep your second child how can those who adopt from China continue to say that the children they are taking out of China are "unwanted" or that the natural parents "made a difficult decision" (as in... "Oh I have less than $204 k in the bank")." <= asked by someone sane

Babies are being snatched for adoption - John Hemming is right, says Consumer Group

[7rin]

Babies are being snatched for adoption John Hemming is right, says Consumer Group
Press Release - 29th January 2007

The government is denying that social workers are targeting babies for adoption. Listening to desperate calls from pregnant women or mothers of new babies and toddlers on our help-line would quickly show their denials are not true.

Health visitors are often instructed to give all parents a "risk rating", if possible while the child is still in the womb, or soon after the birth - this is done without parents' knowledge or consent. The questionnaire used is highly inaccurate as a predictive tool, and has a very high rate of false positives. Pregnant teenagers, the unemployed, anyone with a history of mental illness, and so on, are on the watch list - supposedly so that they can get extra support, but it is often simply extra surveillance. Midwives are instructed to report risk factors, and are losing the trust of the women they care for.

( Read more... )